List of Shark Species and Facts

The Word Democracy - 1600 Words

The word democracy is gotten from the Greek expressions of demos, alluding to individuals and Kratos, which means power. The Greeks are credited with building up the most punctual types of majority rule government around 2,500 years prior. India, Russia, Japan and numerous different countries have just as of late get to be vote based. Along these lines, regardless of its extensive history as an idea, vote based system has just truly turned into a worldwide reality amid the recent portion of the twentieth century. Vote based system implies numerous things to a wide range of individuals. Winston Churchill has the conviction that †¦ majority rule government is the most noticeably bad type of government aside from every one of those different structures that have been attempted occasionally. Democracy is absolutely a type of government, whereby the general population guideline through their chose delegates. The general population are total, and are the incomparable type of political power. Popular government is additionally a gatekeeper of the privileges of all natives and the state may not take away, nor meddle with certain essential rights. At long last majority rules system is the tenet of law, under which all nationals are equivalent. Amid the first many years of our untimely countries presence, it is difficult to envision that the United States would advance to wind up such an extraordinary majority rule government. A vote based system others would like to acceptShow MoreRelatedWhen You Think Of The Word Democracy You Think About A1382 Words   |  6 Pagesthink of the word democracy you think about a politics. I am not a fan of politics at all but when someone says democracy, I think of a system of government that the population votes in a candidate through elected representatives. The schooling system does a good job noftying children that their vote counts. These are the rights that everyone has to fight about because they are very important. People always fight for the right to vote and their voice to be heard. The word democracy just does notRead MoreEssay on Direct Democracy vs Representative Democracy954 Words   |  4 PagesDirect Democracy vs Representative Democracy The term Democracy is derived from two Greek words, demos, meaning people, and kratos, meaning rule. These two words form the word democracy which means rule by the people. Aristotle, and other ancient Greek political philosophers, used the phrase, `the governors are to be the governed, or as we have come to know it, `rule and be ruled in turn. The two major types of democracy are Representative Democracy and Direct Democracy. ClearlyRead More Direct Democracy Vs Representative Democracy Essay956 Words   |  4 PagesDirect Democracy vs Representative Democracy The term Democracy is derived from two Greek words, demos, meaning people, and kratos, meaning rule. These two words form the word democracy which means rule by the people. Aristotle, and other ancient Greek political philosophers, used the phrase, `the governors are to be the governed, or as we have come to know it, `rule and be ruled in turn. The two major types of democracy are Representative Democracy and Direct Democracy. Clearly theRead MoreThe Rule Of The Us Constitution947 Words   |  4 PagesThe words democracy and republicanism are words most commonly used, but often misunderstood. The Father of the US Constitution, James Madison, has been an eye-opener for many who are still uncertain of what the words mean. When we think of the term democracy and republicanism, we automatically make an assumption that reflects on politics, power, voting, elections and parliaments. Madison, however; focused more on liberty, freedom, and what is right for the people. Simultaneously, he felt as if theRead MoreDo Not Be Angry With Me For Speaking Th1627 Words   |  7 Pagesare the words of Socrates, who spoke before the Athenian jury in the trial that would, ultimately, condemn him to his death. Through works such as the Apology and The Republic, we can see Plato’s distaste of the concept of democracy. Why does he consider democracy to be so flawed? Let us look through his own eyes and see wha t his individual criticisms are, and determine if the very concept of democracy is as flawed as he believes it to be. One of the contemporary definitions of democracy today isRead More Platos Criticism of Democracy Essay1697 Words   |  7 PagesPlatos Criticism of Democracy Do not be angry with me for speaking the truth; no man will survive who genuinely opposes you or any other crowd and prevents the occurrence of many unjust and illegal happenings in the city. A man who really fights for justice must lead a private, not a public, life if he is to survive for even a short time. (Apology 31e-32a) These are the words of Socrates, who spoke before the Athenian jury in the trial that would, ultimately, condemn him to his death. ThroughRead MoreIs Islam a Religion of Peace?1879 Words   |  7 Pagesimplied that Islam, as a religion, is opposed to warfare, extremism and terrorist activities. On the contrary, in the realm of political science, democracy is the system of government that is set up on a high pedestal. Democracy is not only portrayed as inherently virtuous, but is also a system that ensures peace and harmony in any region. Both democracy and Islam thus claim the right to peace, however, the fact that Muslim majority countries often adopt a non-democratic system of government createsRead MoreDefining Politics and Democracy Essay1572 Words   |  7 PagesDefining Politics and Democracy The word Politics is derived from the Greek word for city-state, Polis. Corporate, religious, academic and every other polity, especially those constrained by limited resources, contain dominance hierarchy and therefore politics. Politics is most often studied in relation to the administration of governments. Politics is the process and method of gaining or maintaining support for public or common action. Although it is generallyRead MoreEssay on Athenian definition of democracy1213 Words   |  5 PagesDiscuss the Athenian definition of democracy. Is the city state the only kind of state in which true democracy can exist? What happens to democracy when it is applied to a society with a large dispersed population? What are other examples of democratic societies besides Athens? Compare and contrast Athenian democracy with American democracy. Is the United States a democracy in the classical sense of the word? nbsp;nbsp;nbsp;nbsp;nbsp;The ancient Greek word quot;demokratiaquot; was ambiguousRead MoreDemocratic Individualism in Walt Whitman Poetry1663 Words   |  7 Pageswell-known, superb poet. Clarence Brown stated, the words of someone speaking on Walt Whitman, â€Å"He is the only one of the conventionally recognized American poets who is worth reading† (37). Walt Whitman is a poet that writes with purpose. His poetry seems to attempt to teach the more desirable behavior and traits for Americans. It depicts the ideal American democrat, peace maker, and a well-rounded person, in general. Not that Walt Whitman is only about democracy. He focuses on an important end result which

Voting Research Paper Free Essays

string(413) " registered to vote or not and how they got registered; if they participate in voting if so what they vote on; whether voting is important to them and their families; if their parents participate in voting; if they understand how our voting system works and where they found out how to vote; if they agree on how our voting system works why or why not and if they feel voting is an important part in our country\." Voting is privilege given to Americans. Many people don’t know how lucky they are to have the privilege to give their opinion on who leads our country. It took many years for the U. We will write a custom essay sample on Voting Research Paper or any similar topic only for you Order Now S to get voting rights equalized for all citizens; so everyone should take advantage of this. Participating in voting should be happening by every eligible person in the U. S. A person’s characteristics will effect whether or not they are going to participate in voting. It can either positively affect the person or negatively. Also registering and knowing where and how to register and where too actually vote can effect whether or not a person will participate in voting. A major aspect effecting voting is a person’s family history; if growing up in a family where your family isn’t participating in voting than most likely that young person will not feel the need/responsibility to vote when eligible. A person age can effect whether people will vote or not, usually the younger generation does not participate in voting. Also if people aren’t educated on how to register or even on what they’re voting on – tend not o bother on figuring out how too. The importance of voting is of interest to me because it directly affects me. Voting affects everyone and knowing how we got to where we are in regards to voting is interesting. Voting is so important for many reasons and I think it will be interesting to also find out by surveying young people how many of them actually vote and why or why they don’t participate in voting. The history of voting in the United States goes back to the colonial times. In colonial times the right to vote was limited to only adult white males who owned property. Majority of women were banned from voting with exceptions of widows who owned property during this time. By 1830, the property requirements were abolished and then all white male adults could vote. (History of Voting Rights 1). Throughout history voting laws expanded to eventually giving the right to vote to majority of U. S citizens. In 1870, the fifteenth amendment was established stating that the right to vote cannot be denied due to race. This was five years after the civil war was fought, finally giving African Americans and any other race the chance to participate in voting. Even though all races were allowed to vote, women did not fully gain that privilege until the nineteenth amendment was established in 1920. The nineteenth amendment states that â€Å"The rights of citizens of the United States to vote shall not be denied or abridged by the United States or by any States on account of sex. † This was a huge accomplishment for women throughout the country. In 1971 the twenty-sixth amendment lowered the voting age to eighteen for all states, before this was established only ten sates allowed citizens under the age of twenty-one to participate in voting. (Mount 1). Having voting offered to American citizens eliminates discrimination of voting because everyone has a chance to voice their opinion. We have voting rights in the United States because the United States is about choices. Many countries do not get to voice their opinion as openly as we are in the United States. Voting is a very important part of our history; everyone should respect the struggles our country faced in order to give the people of the United States all the right to vote by voting. The rules of voting have changed many times throughout the years. As of now you must be eighteen years old, and you must be currently a U. S citizen. There is a lot of controversy on weather convicted felons should or should not be allowed to vote. The answer to that depends on where you live, seven states still have strict restrictions on letting felons vote. In order to vote you must be registered. You can register in different ways. One way is call a 800 number and get a registration form sent to your house fill it out and mail it back in to your local city or town hall. You must receive your confirmation to know you are definitely registered. Another way to register is to register in person at any registration location where you must complete a series of questions to qualify you to be allowed to vote. Some high schools automatically register you when they know you are turning eighteen they will send in the form for you. You can also register at motor vehicles by filling out a form. Galvin 1) When voting you must bring a form of identification. Acceptable identification can be; your voter’s registration certificate along with a drivers license and or a photo I. D that you can get from motor vehicles. In order to be able to vote you must be registered twenty days prior to Election Day. (Galvin 1) Registering to vote is very simple, does not take up time and is worth it. In order to find out first hand if young people are participating in voting or not and if certain characteristics truly do effect this I conducted a 100 person survey. Surveying people is the best method to find out about voting their take on voting because it’s a non judgmental way to hopefully get the truth. Also I got to pick mainly who I wanted to get surveyed; for this study I only surveyed people under the age of 30 because I was more interested on how younger people are or aren’t participating in voting. This was an easy task because my first thirty surveys got handed out throughout class, than the other seventy I distributed out at work where I in counter young people all throughout the day so it was still a random survey. In my survey I asked the person’s gender and age, whether they were registered to vote or not and how they got registered; if they participate in voting if so what they vote on; whether voting is important to them and their families; if their parents participate in voting; if they understand how our voting system works and where they found out how to vote; if they agree on how our voting system works why or why not and if they feel voting is an important part in our country. You read "Voting Research Paper" in category "Free Research Paper Samples" These were all questions to find out basics about young voters and young non-voters as to why or why they don’t vote, and also certain characteristics such as their ages and gender and family history and how that might affect the person. Before conducting this survey I wasn’t expecting to find many young people to take an interest on the topic of voting. I also believed most young people who say they are registered to vote and do participate actively in voting that their families also participate in voting. I expected to find more young women to participate in voting rather than young men. After finishing my survey and collecting the results I found out when comparing females to males that majority of females that are registered do participate voting, rather than the majority of males that are registered less do actually participate in voting. Also as a whole I found out that when asking the people who do vote whether their families do vote majority of them claimed that their families do vote, and when asking people who are registered but do not participate in voting that majority of their families do not participate in voting. When going through my results looking at most people who are registered to vote but still didn’t participate in voting they did not register themselves, majority of them checked the spot saying that their high school automatically registered them. Surprisingly I found a lot of people do believe voting is an important part of our country but that they do not believe they way our system works is fairly, a lot of answers claim that they believe their vote doesn’t count and that is why they don’t bother participating in voting. It’s refreshing to see that many young people do believe in voting and even better seeing how many do actually participate. The results and my anticipation matched up to a point. More women than men do participate in voting from my calculations, but I didn’t expect to even find as many people interested in voting as I did. I believed more women take a part in voting and I found that is true because women didn’t always have the right to vote so now that we do and learning about the struggles it took to get women to vote may be why more women do participate in voting rather than most men who were almost always offered the right to vote. I learned that many people do not even know how our voting system works or where to register. Registering is so easy to do, I think the best way to register is to offer it in high-schools, not something that’s done automatically because than people aren’t really interested they are just registered but having it offered makes it an easy way for people right as they become eligible and also can teach them how and where they can participate in voting. Looking at voting from a functional analysis point of view would be pro-voting. The people who do believe voting is important and that their opinion does matter and does contribute to the outcome of what they’re voting on is the same as looking at society as a whole but knowing that each different part of society makes up a different part and has its own function. Society’s function is to vote on its leaders, the leaders function is to run and try to their best ability to satisfy the needs of its society. In one survey when answering if they find voting to be important in our country; do you think it makes a difference why or why not a person answered â€Å"Yes, every voice counts and can cause change. This is showing that some people do function and do their part in society. This is a macro way of looking at things; functional people gather data on the people they might be voting on and decide who will make a change to better their society and that’s who they chose to vote for. Looking at the topic of voting from a conflict theorist point of view you can split up society by many different groups for example democrats and republicans and how everyone who participates in voting votes one or the other do try and get their party into authority. This sort of conflict can cause a positive change if who eventually gets chosen makes a positive change in society. Again this is a macro way of looking at voting because people are researching on who’s running who’s part of which party and what that person represents and then they cast their vote hoping for the best outcome possible. I was pleased with my results because although not everyone participates in voting more young people than I expected are actually registered and do participate in voting which is a positive sign. I believe my survey could have been more conclusive if I surveyed a larger amount of people, 100 young people I thought would be more than enough but it really doesn’t give a big picture on the topic. Also if I could re-do this survey I would try to do an even amount of males surveyed as females surveyed just to keep that aspect of the survey equal. There are so many important reasons to participate in voting. The outcome of elections will have an impact on everyone in the United States lives. If you are unhappy with how our country is being run, or unhappy about a certain situation voting can help make a change for you. Many believe that there vote does not really count so they do not bother to even vote. They figure there are millions of other people voting so why should they even try; the fact of the matter is that everyone’s vote does count and every time you vote it does make a difference. A lot of people believe the government and the people in charge do not have an effect on them. Elected officials make many decisions that affect everyone. The president has the power to either raise or lower taxes for all Americans so how does that decision not affect everyone. (Importance of Voting 1). The more young people participate in voting the more it shows that there interested which will result in the government being interested in younger people’s problems and helping in making a change. You see and hear about so many complaints regarding our government and the problems they cause or the problems they aren’t helping, if you don’t vote how do you expect this to change. The United States is lucky that the citizens are allowed to participate in picking the country’s leaders, if they don’t participate though the democracy will not run properly or fairly. Voting is the fairest way for a leader to be chosen. It’s not racist, sexist or biased everyone get there voice to be heard by voting. Some believe voting should be considered mandatory. It’s a proven fact that enforcing mandatory voting that there will definitely be an increase in the amount of voters. In some cases there was a 94. 6 percent increase. (Lansford, 55). â€Å"We live in a country where no matter what you believe, no matter what your race, sex or religion you are allowed to voice it, so take advantage of it and vote. † (Stimpson 1). So many different characteristics play a part on voting including a person’s gender age and their family’s history and take on voting. Learning how and where to register to vote is also an important part of voting, I found out that a lot of people don’t understand how registering and voting in our country is done, this also reflects on a young person’s family and how they participate in voting – or how they don’t and that’s why young people aren’t interested in the topic. There’s many changes that can be done to help bring up the average of young people voting – and any person voting. How to cite Voting Research Paper, Essays

According To Fair Work Commission Adopting †Myassignmenthelp.Com

Question: Explain On According To Fair Work Commission Adopting? Answer: Introduction The Better Off Overall Test is a strategy often adopted by the Fair Work Commission while deciding if to support a proposed venture understanding. This test depends on the important present day grant that covers any worker secured by the proposed venture assertion as pointed out by Clark, Taylor, and Oakes (2016, p. 67). According to Fair Work Commission (FWC) (2016), adopting the test recommends that every worker honor and forthcoming honor secured representative must e perfectly placed on the understanding opposed to how they might be when the important current world links to them. The Better Off Overall Test is linked as a time for testing. This time is when the applications for endorsement of assertion was made, application date was stopped by Fair Work Commission. This paper examines and evaluates the Better Off Overall Test with a focus on application as well as its strengths and weaknesses. The paper concludes by evaluating effective recommendations that can be adopted with th e aim of improving Better Off Overall Test. Any adaptability assertion made under the pertinent present day honor may not be considered for the reasons for the Better Off Overall Test. In his study, Stevens (2017) also asserts that this is on account of it is expected that any plans made under the adaptability arrangements in a present day honor would be considered in the arranging procedure. There is also a possibility of framing some portion of the assertion or arranged again under the adaptability term in the understanding if affirmed. The test is not connected to a line by line investigation (FWC, 2017). It is a global test that needs thought of points of interest and burdens to give secured representatives and impending honor secured workers. The question presented by BOOT is not if every worker is in a better situation under the assertion contrasted with the particular working actions given at the time. However, if they are under ideal conditions generally when the understanding connects as opposed to important present d ay grant as stated by Hannan (2016, p 3). The Better Off Overall Test applies in the same manner to all workers protected by the suggested aggregate assertion, including the people who might be accountable to high pay edges. Despite the Test requiring each honor protected representative to be perfect, Fair Work Commission might accept that every worker within an assigned group of workers are in a perfect situation when the assertion breezes across the Test if connected to the class. The expression class of representatives is planned to allude to a gathering of workers secured by the undertaking assertion who share normal attributes that empower them to be dealt with as a gathering when the Fair Work Commission applies the Better Off Overall Test (Clark, Taylor, and Oakes, 2016, p. 56). A case is the place the representatives are in a similar order, review or employment level, or worth similar working examples. The Better Off Overall Test permits grant conditions, yet not National Employment Standards' conditions to be exchanged off or avoided the length of the aggregate compensation as well as advantages gotten by the representative abandon them preferable off over if the conditions continued as before. The use of the Test in this manner requires the ID of the terms of an understanding which are more advantageous to representatives when contrasted with the pertinent present day grant, and the terms of an assertion which are less helpful and afterward a general e valuation of whether a worker would be in an ideal situation under the understanding. This test depends on the important present day grant that spreads representatives that will be protected by the suggested undertaking assertion. It demands that every honor, secured worker and every impending honor secured representative needs to be in a perfect situation concerning the understanding than they might when the applicable current day gives them connection. Desir (2017) also claims that the BOOT permits grant conditions, however, not National Employment Standards (NES) conditions to be exchanged off or avoided given the aggregate compensation and additionally benefits gotten by the worker abandon them preferable off over if the conditions continued as before. Application of BOOT The Fair Work Commission has expelled an application by HM to endorse their 2016 undertaking concession to the premise that it didn't fulfill the Better Off Overall Test. The choice, directed by representative president Geoffrey Bull on Monday, conveys a conclusion to a protracted disagreement regarding the assertion amongst HM and the Shop, Distributive and Allied Employees' Association and also Josh Cullinan, who heads up the unregistered Retail and Fast Food Workers Union as pointed out by Hannan, (2016) in her review. As per the endorsement application, an investigation of 50 haphazardly picked easygoing programs by the SDA found that two out of 50 workers were awful off contrasted with the honor under the understanding. The focal cases made by the SDA identified with the absence of an additional time provision in the understanding and the capacity of HM to program workers on each Sunday, though the honor gives that a most extreme of three Sundays in four might be enlisted. The SDA raised further worries about inadequate break times, and working hours being found the middle value of to guarantee that representatives weren't being made a request to take a shot at weekday nighttimes and ends of the week time after time according to the argument presented by Marin-Guzman (2017, p 4). Cullinan contended that the loss of punishment rates on weeknights and Saturdays and a lower punishment rate on Sunday leaves numerous laborers more regrettable off than the honor. As per Cullinan, any non-easygoing worker working more than 60 for each penny of their hours after 6 pm on a weekday or Saturday would be more regrettable off than the honor under the assertion. Accordingly, HM presented that the understanding left salaried representatives happier general since it obliged them to guarantee least pay rates for all hours worked met the honor and incorporated extra advantages, for example, longer breaks, parental leave, volunteer leave and expanded notice of end. On the other hand, Marin-Guzman (2017) points out that HM additionally had a suggestion that their particular inside investigation showed that the most astounding rate of hours worked by a representative on ends of the week was 51.9 for each penny. SDA national secretary Gerard Dwyer communicated his enthusiasm for recharging transactions with HM in the foundation of another understanding based on the views of Clark, Taylor Oakes (2016). The SDA now looks for the chance to arrange a concurrence with HM that contains reasonable pay and working conditions and follows the states of the FWC's BOOT test. Australian Retailers Association boss Russell Zimmerman did not have any desire to rem ark on individual cases but rather revealed to Inside Retail that conditions are achieving a point where Australian retailers are with the view that it is often hard to rival their partners in the US and UK. Zimmerman indicated the patterns in government endeavor dealing report discharged in Q1 2016, which found that in 2013, there were 1,248 retail venture understandings contrasted with just 263 in 2016. Strengths and Weaknesses of BOOT For bosses, the Better Off Overall Test can give a substantially less difficult framework to compensating its representatives when contrasted with the strict use of the pertinent present day grant. In numerous working environments, there is more than one honor that applies to its representatives, however even where there is not the case the understanding and use of a present day honor can be mind boggling and tedious for bosses as stated by Fair Work Commission (FWC) (2017). A Better Off Overall Test can streamline this procedure by joining additional time, punishment rates, recompenses and other honor qualifications into a base rate payable to workers as indicated by their grouping level under the honor. It likewise implies that for every new representative you often give them a duplicate of the Better Off Overall Test, and there is no requirement for an individual business contract. The arrangement of a Better Off Overall Test gives the chance to tailor the consent to the particular needs of the business. This procedure additionally guarantees straightforwardness and results in assertion between the gatherings with respect to what's in store for each other. In a strategic review, Low (2017) denotes that there is likewise assurance from mechanical activity amid the ostensible existence of the Better Off Overall Test. For workers, there is a confirmation that the terms of the Better Off Overall Test set them in a place that is In an ideal situation Overall than if they were paid entirely as per the significant present day grant. Reasonable Work Australia won't favor a Better Off Overall Test unless the BOOT is fulfilled, which puts the worker in a superior position accordingly of the Better Off Overall Test. In his study, Angwin (2017) points out that, the haggling procedure of a Better Off Overall Test likewise gives workers the chance to combine and to altogethe r deal on the terms of the assertion, regularly with the advantage of union portrayal. This can be a great deal more intense process than an individual representative endeavoring to arrange terms one on one with the business. What are the weaknesses of a Better Off Overall Test? For bosses, the principle disservice is the time and cost required to arrange the Better Off Overall Test and to experience the endorsement procedure with Fair Work Australia. There is a strict procedure and period that must be taken after and any inability to take after these can bring about the dismissal of the Better Off Overall Test as mentioned by Wright, Lansbury (2016, p. 89). For representatives, there are for the most part, not a lot of disservices to being a gathering to a Better Off Overall Test. On the off chance that a worker needs to be spoken to by the union then they are required to pay union expenses which, after some time, can add up to a lot of cash as stated by Oakes and Clark, (2016). Advance, with a specific end goal to be affirmed a Better Off Overall Test, requires a larger part, not consistent vote. On the off chance that a worker does not concur with the union or with the greater part vote then they don' t have any alternatives other than to be liable to the assertion. Improving BOOT It remains the case that businesses need to present material to the FWC that shows that every worker secured by a proposed assertion will be in an ideal situation generally speaking when contrasted with the important honor. McPhail, Jerrard, Southcombe (2015) claim that bosses who do this and present the material in a straightforward and thorough way, place themselves in a decent position to have their assertions affirmed. Notwithstanding, for managers who through their undertaking assertions look to pay grant rates or rates near the honor, the mind must be taken when trying to counterbalance lacks in fiscal qualifications with enhanced unforeseen privileges. Various practices have created over late years in this regard. For instance, arrangements that apparently purchase out sundry honor stipends with an all up BOOT style remittance are moderately normal in big business understandings in the work employ industry. More far-reaching are practiced, as at Coles, where bosses look to change what are considered by many to be obsolete punishment rate frameworks, especially for the end of the week or nightfall work based on the arguments of Patrick (2017, p. 37). Adroitly, endeavor understandings that try to do these things can be executed effectively. In the same way as other things, however, it is an issue of adjusting. At last, the proposed assertion must accommodate each worker secured by it to be in an ideal situation in general when contrasted with the fundamental honor. In an undeniably aggressive market where most managers are taking a gander at their work costs, the Coles choice exhibits that in big business haggling, this can be a testing exercise. The choice is likewise imperative as it flags that a little gathering of efficient representatives can impede venture assertions covering extensive national managers, against the desires of the unfathomable majority of the workforce according to Waring, Cooper, Macneil (2014). Managers hence should be mindful so as to guarantee that new assertions contain adequate advantages for all classes of specialists so that the BOOT will be met and the understanding endorsed as pointed out by Stevens, (2017, p. 32). The use of the system in production has been proved as one of the best means through which sustainability would be attained for business. The system of operation by which is technique is based is an impressive one that only goes for the best options in the market. Any businesses across the world would successfully implement the system in order to improve their performance. Conclusion The Better Off Overall Test permits grant conditions, yet not National Employment Standards' conditions to be exchanged off or avoided the length of the aggregate compensation as well as advantages gotten by the representative abandon them preferable off over if the conditions continued as before. The use of the Test needs the ID of the terms of an understanding which are more advantageous to representatives when contrasted with the pertinent present day grant, and the terms of an assertion which are less helpful and afterward a general evaluation of whether a worker would be in an ideal situation under the understanding. References Angwin, M 2017, EBAs are now just a blockage to productivity, Australian Financial Review, 14 February, p. 39. Bray, M, Waring, P, Cooper, R Macneil, J 2014, Employment relations: Theory and practice, 3rd edn,McGraw-Hill Education (Australia), North Ryde. Clark, S, Taylor, J Oakes, D 2016, Coles could be forced to renegotiate pay deal with thousands of workers after Fair Work ruling, ABC News, 31 May. Available at URL: https://www.abc.net.au/news/2016-05-31/part-time-coles-worker-wins-fair-case-against-supermarket-giant/7463132 [Accessed 28 February 2017]. Desir, B 2017, HM enterprise agreement fails BOOT, National Retail Association, 29 January. Available at URL: https://www.nra.net.au/hm-enterprise-agreement-fails-boot/[Accessed 2 March 2017]. Fair Work Commission (FWC) 2016, Decision FWCFB 2887: s.604 Appeal of decisions: Vice President Watson, Deputy President Kovacic Commissioner Roe: Melbourne, 31 May 2016, FWC, Commonwealth Government Printer. Fair Work Commission (FWC) 2017, Decision FWC 310: s. 185 Application for approval of a single-enterprise agreement: H M Pty Ltd, Sydney, 16 January 2017, FWC, Commonwealth Government Printer. Hannan, E 2016, Coles workers may lose pay rise after Fair Work veto, Australian Financial Review, 10 June, p. 7. Hannan, E 2016, Fair Work ruling could hurt Coles staff, Australian Financial Review, 1 June, p. 3. Low, C 2017, HM fails to secure enterprise agreement, Sydney Morning Herald, 17 January. Available at URL: https://www.smh.com.au/business/retail/hm-fails-to-secure-enterprise-agreement-20170117-gtsxwl.html [Accessed 28 February 2017]. Marin-Guzman, D 2017, Fair Work takes swipe at H M over failing to disclose pay cuts, Australian Financial Review, 18 January, p. 3. Marin-Guzman, D 2017, Watson cuts moorings with final dissent, Australian Financial Review, 23 January, p. 4. McPhail, R, Jerrard, M Southcombe, A 2015, Employment relations: an integrated approach, Cengage Learning Australia, South Melbourne. Oakes, D Clark, S 2016, Coles refuses to boost penalty rates for workers despite Fair Work ruling, ABC News, 10 June. Available at URL: https://www.abc.net.au/news/2016-06-09/coles-refuses-to-boost-penalty-rates-despite-fair-work-ruling/7496114 [Accessed 28 February 2017]. Patrick, A 2017, Fair Work Commission at war with itself, Australian Financial Review, 24 January, p. 37. Stevens, M 2017, Brutally honest of broken system, Australian Financial Review, 23 January, p. 28. Stevens, M 2017, Fair Work tinkers as IR system burns, Australian Financial Review, 24 February, p. 32. Wright, CF Lansbury, RD 2016, Employment relations in Australia, in GJ Bamber, RD Lansbury, N Wailes CF Wright(eds), International and comparative employment relations:National regulation, global changes, 6th edn, eds, Allen Unwin, Crows Nest